From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 28 21:22:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F35837B401 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:22:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out005.verizon.net (out005pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2877243F75 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:22:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) Received: from kokeb.ambesa.net ([138.88.144.71]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030429042202.ULRH25152.out005.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:22:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:22:01 -0400 From: Mike Makonnen To: FreeBSD-rc@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <20030429021850.GA67022@BSDWins.Com> References: <6100BCEB85F8E244959C756C04E0EDD1010F7EEA@otcexc01.otc.adaptec.com> <20030428151302.G60570@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz> <20030428223537.GA68013@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030428233952.GA66229@BSDWins.Com> <20030429021850.GA67022@BSDWins.Com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [138.88.144.71] at Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:22:01 -0500 Message-Id: <20030429042202.ULRH25152.out005.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-rc@yahoogroups.com cc: jwd@bsdwins.com Subject: Re: /etc/netstart patch update (Was: Re: [FreeBSD-rc] Re: RFC: Removal of the old rc system from -curr ent) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 04:22:04 -0000 On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:18:50 -0400 John De Boskey wrote: > Some comments: > > Is there a reason we have atm1, and then atm2.sh & atm3.sh? This > naming scheme does not seem to be followed by any of the other > numerically postfixed scripts. If a script has a '.sh' suffix it means that it's is run inside the callers process. Otherwise, the default is to run the script in a subshell. In rcNG this means that if you need persistence of a variable from one script to another you need to give it a .sh suffix. The atm2.sh and atm3.sh scripts share a couple of variables, so it was necessary to have them execute in the same process as /etc/rc. Ideally, this shouldn't happen, but I don't have an ATM interface and I don't know how it's supposed to be setup, so I left those scripts largely untouched in hopes that someone who does use them can rewrite the scripts for rcNG. > I believe etc/network_ipv6 needs the following patch: Correct. Thanks. > I can deal > with atm?.sh if folks think it should be done. If you know what you're doing with ATM, yes please. Otherwise, please leave them as they are. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - The Power To Serve