From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Aug 20 10:39:42 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id KAA09995
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 20 Aug 1995 10:39:42 -0700
Received: from quake.xnet.com (quake.xnet.com [198.147.221.34])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA09987
          for <hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 1995 10:39:40 -0700
Received: from simon.chi.il.us by quake.xnet.com (8.6.11/XNet-1.2R)
         with SMTP id MAA03273; Sun, 20 Aug 1995 12:39:11 -0500
Received: by simon.chi.il.us (Smail3.1.29.1 #3)
	id m0skEHs-0006ILC; Sun, 20 Aug 95 12:35 CDT
Message-Id: <m0skEHs-0006ILC@simon.chi.il.us>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 95 12:35 CDT
From: steve@simon.chi.il.us (Steven E. Piette)
To: dima@bog.msu.su, davidg@Root.COM
Subject: Re: Making a FreeBSD NFS server
Cc: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> To: Dmitry Khrustalev <dima@bog.msu.su>
> cc: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
> Subject: Re: Making a FreeBSD NFS server 
> From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
> Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 1995 01:23:52 -0700
> 
>    Regarding NFSv3: v3 is only an option if you have clients that support it.
> This is actually quite rare and would limit it's use to modern FreeBSD boxes.
> ...and of course, FreeBSD 2.1 doesn't have v3 and I don't intend to add it
> before the release.
> 
> -DG
> 

Darn, I saw all this traffic on NFSv3 in the past so I went out and installed
Solaris 2.5 Beta to test it against. I guess I should have read the mail a
lot closer. Oh well. Getting 2.5 to run on a SS1+ was interesting in it's own
right.

Steve