From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Oct 28 9:40:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317EB151C6 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id JAA08209; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199910281640.JAA08209@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Matthew Hunt Subject: Re: docs/14567: camcontrol(8) sez to see cam(9) and xpt(9) but there ain't no such Reply-To: Matthew Hunt Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/14567; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matthew Hunt To: Chris Costello Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, ken@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/14567: camcontrol(8) sez to see cam(9) and xpt(9) but there ain't no such Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 09:39:20 -0700 On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 06:00:02PM -0700, Chris Costello wrote: > > ? Create a cam(9) man page ? > > Yes please. You can send the patches as a reply to this PR. > I've been meaning to figure out what to document, but if you're > willing to do it, I will accept, review (and have Ken review) > and commit the pages. cam(4) and xpt(4) exist. My assumption is that camcontrol(8) should refer to these, and the (9) was a mistake? -- Matthew Hunt * UNIX is a lever for the http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * intellect. -J.R. Mashey To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message