Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:06:16 +0100 From: Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: make release doesn't correctly include EXTLOCALDIR ? Message-ID: <B8D905E7-3EAD-4A31-B535-E284E9A91C74@my.gd>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello list, I'm running 8.3-stable r245223 from a mere 2 days ago and am in the process of building a custom release for our internal use as preconfigured firewalls. "make release" works pretty fine except for a few quirks here and there. First of all, I have set EXTLOCALDIR so that the release contains my existing /usr/local/ , and thus the collection of installed ports. The problem here is that while /release/usr/local/ is correctly populated, the ISO images and ftp install directory have an empty usr/local/ Extracting the ISO's base.?? files doesn't yield the /usr/local/ contents either. The second problem I encounter is with the kernel's build. Apparently "make release" doesn't pull MODULES_OVERRIDE from /etc/make.conf and decides to build every single module, as opposed to my own restricted list. I'm going to try with with KERNEL_FLAGS=-DMODULES_OVERRIDE module1 module2 in /usr/src/release/Makefile Has anyone else ever experienced the same problem regarding the inclusion of /usr/local/ in their release ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B8D905E7-3EAD-4A31-B535-E284E9A91C74>