Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 17:29:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208130] smbfs is slow because it (apparently) doesn't do any caching/buffering Message-ID: <bug-208130-3630-SsL9zJpacL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-208130-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-208130-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208130 --- Comment #6 from noah.bergbauer@tum.de --- I still don't know what causes this extra 0.65ms latency (see my previous comment for details) but I noticed that there appears to be some per-mount synchronization going on: Two IO streams on a single smbfs mount share the 60MB/s bandwidth, i.e. they get 30 each, whereas two unique mounts of the s= ame samba share each get the full 60MB/s. And indeed: just slap a gmultipath(8)= in there and the bandwidth issue is gone! This hack is quite a mess but so far it's stable, fast and it works astonishingly great. I'm actually planning using this in production. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208130-3630-SsL9zJpacL>