From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Apr 21 17:55:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3A737B423 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:55:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f3M0taA06614; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:55:36 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Larry Rosenman Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/26224 Message-ID: <20010421175536.R1790@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010421195305.A19571@lerami.lerctr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010421195305.A19571@lerami.lerctr.org>; from ler@lerctr.org on Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 07:53:05PM -0500 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Larry Rosenman [010421 17:53] wrote: > Should I upgrade that machine to 4.3-STABLE and see if anything > changes? > > What help/assistance can I be to get the problem fixed...???? Perhaps upgrading will solve the issues, I haven't heard of anyone else experiencing the problem, not that it makes you problem any less important, just that much harder to debug. :( I would try 4.3, let us know if it's still an issue. How often is it a problem anyhow? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [alfred@freebsd.org] Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message