From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 17 14:56:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03400 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:56:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from root.com (root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03395 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:56:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@root.com) Received: from root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA00813; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:56:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199811172256.OAA00813@root.com> To: Wes Peters cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0 vs. 3.0 -- more info In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 17 Nov 1998 15:48:48 MST." <3651FD50.351BBC9E@xylan.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:56:02 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >> I'm not aware of any problems with the fxp driver in 3.x. I have a system >> here with the same rev 5 82558 chip, on the motherboard, that you have there >> and it works fine with 3.x. > >Can I tickle the fxp driver to me a little more verbose when I use the >ifconfig command? It would be useful to see what it thinks it's doing >on the way to hanging the system. Sure you can - you don't need my permission. :-) ...but you'll need to add some kernel printfs to the driver code. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message