From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 20 19:16:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295B5106566B for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60CE8FC16 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so5075174bwz.13 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:16:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GjdQZ9i+cizW3qj7CLuqLXbs1Yp2OlvvnxvcFXcVOB4=; b=wlMkEhV6b0GAukAfolp4jaYZxBzm5220o/Zwk6FTkpy3i8MoutriHEo+nTHVAJlwfA Kdx3+vORx+4ZIGbNvGRT37L10Fa7c3KM2qktR+TYswT2nT0WmmU4lPX184LIMO/Q1UbE PY3KXgDwJO2BHFjkv6BQtamXStKuiKk8ggYRU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=S7EtHBFd+H5w1cPgAS9IBTz5g26YV0PtdgHUkQkYIPbcroZoHLXs/i9JRd/LM4JnHu twNOGAanGPvrqvhpOnRuu+olvfQCOYGLSb2VrFPUPa8JKuO++imqDsTAdvnz6X9nfFFm wnGYkGvR6hPfqUTPWlw4Ho1EVNuXpiUkWl9p0= Received: by 10.204.119.134 with SMTP id z6mr3489745bkq.166.1290280563159; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:16:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:15:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101120123442.2074a054@scorpio> References: <201011192054.oAJKsOPk011590@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20101119163648.19c9e66a@scorpio> <20101119172200.4e9c8cd5@scorpio> <20101120123442.2074a054@scorpio> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:15:32 +0000 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: openssl version - how to verify X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:16:05 -0000 On 20 November 2010 17:34, Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:56:05 +0000 > Chris Rees articulated: > >> >> > > While I agree with your point in this context, the statement >> >> > > "The number of _UNDISCOVERED_ bugs, on the other hand, is an >> >> > > infinite one." is false. >> >> > > >> >> > http://www.unsw.edu.au/news/pad/articles/2009/sep/microkernel_breakthrough.html >> >> People believed Aristotle's assurances about the rate of things >> falling for nearly 2000 years until Galileo and Newton pointed out >> 'obvious' flaws in his method. > > Which is precisely my point in regards to the link shown above. > Er, no. YOU have the burden of proof in your assertion, 'obvious' is not good enough. The link above refers to a study; if you think there's been a bug then show us. Chris