From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Oct 29 20:59:21 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id UAA02320 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 20:59:21 -0800 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA02307 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 20:59:16 -0800 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA10767; Sun, 29 Oct 1995 20:59:05 -0800 Message-Id: <199510300459.UAA10767@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.2 7/18/95 To: Julian Elischer cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Jim Lowe Subject: Re: Buffer cache , lmbench part 3 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 29 Oct 1995 20:35:01 PST." <199510300435.UAA09703@ref.tfs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 20:59:04 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >>> Julian Elischer said: > How do you know it's buffer_cache? Cause that's Jim said ... Not sure if Jim recorded the space launch on tape. However, I am sure that he can try to record something else and see if he gets similar results. Currently, I am little handicap because I can't capture video on FreeBSD , argh... and the video capture at least under Windows sucks . Hopefully, in the near future I will be able to get my Diamond S3 968 + mpeg/video capture daugther card working on FreeBSD. Tnks for the tip!! Amancio > you could put the 'sync' (update) frequency to 1 > sysctl -w kern.update=1 > (I think) > and try again.. > (I presume he has it on tape....) > you don't want to go synchronous > but you don't want to be so asynchronous that the ram fills up > and you end up waiting on disk.. > > > try this.... > > > > > > > > Jim Lowe recorded the last space shuttle launch on his FreeBSD box;however , > > he ran into a minor gotcha the buffer cache. If you want to see the > > buffer cache in action just play the mpeg movie and look for pauses on > > on the movie. So the question now is: Is the buffer cache tuneble to > > avoid this kind of behavior? > > > > I was thinking that video capture without compression eats up enourmous > > amount of disk space so it would not be too unconceivable to bypass the > > file system and buffer cache and just do raw I/O to the disk. > > > > Here is a pointer to Jim's mpeg version of the space shuttle launch it > > is about 1.7mb and the original was 300MB : > > > > ftp://ftp.cs.uwm.edu/pub/shuttle_gifs/sts73.launch.mpg. > > > > Enjoy, > > Amancio > > > > > > >