From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 17 10:52:39 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA49B1065673
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:52:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gkontos.mail@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.212.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2F08FC14
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:52:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so2077203vbm.13
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 03:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type; bh=0Y1L+MYLp8reKcNG4X3a273utAapH/Yg6feFXeKsPxk=;
	b=Ujoe5pjayK4ObKVP4wCEnxkhPi3PmpbHI+uK+un+VKKsDl0sx4uyvow+NIU5xk/YPF
	QIhkqUE9dtkPazQ5/nvVqxKVfDRjtEPos55zs3fdATfFPMGIEXnyF6xF+DG0CYgtlfYN
	QkIeYQ+RIk/ehIyfBj3eB2IVKTjiLKhrtO/t7EJjE7wMBqqTSf9cZ09/U8ATB/wh91uf
	b46imJfl92419GuQIQC213v+OY1qvoKGRUDVSf4dacoypZvlWRPGeO3oY64JLSue56xu
	zVJoxst2EVKCvH3hwo/vKQ2Qe4bXpdOYhvgSyVgCcxRNe092habnuhCSHO8JXrILiIWp
	/3Zg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.150.205 with SMTP id z13mr4797750vcv.19.1337251958875;
	Thu, 17 May 2012 03:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.8.202 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 03:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZhtxvNM3kiK5mvTZCxzkTiVWKt97yAudfaxFCnjbANQ0g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOfEmZh8v5xbQqkJJ7ZKkan7Ho0FPNrXJ95S1WRpioDXVG6P7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120515102206.GA53750@psconsult.nl>
	<CAOfEmZiTkr9Xcj6J4FRBd4FzL1ztgEpytSAUc=wZ8DBJtXsH+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+dUSyrG-RFFjchEYfovbvORVBZNHes9r9MhhGG1d568cO-CwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOfEmZhtxvNM3kiK5mvTZCxzkTiVWKt97yAudfaxFCnjbANQ0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:52:38 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+dUSyppT+ngjn9UXBVW1K0eDa93OB00Rd=TX31brwmAaxNy8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: Mirror of Raidz for data reliability
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:52:39 -0000

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> wrote:
> George,
>
>>
>> If you have 2 machines then your best bet would be HAST.
>
>
> So, why use ETHERNET if my Machine can see both JBOD?

I was under the impression that you are talking about 2 different
physical machines.

>> If you are worried about data replication you can always use lagg with
>> 2 or more interfaces.
>
>
> It is different than data replication. It is data protection.

Storing the same data in 2 different locations is data protection.

Regards

-- 
George Kontostanos
Aicom telecoms ltd
http://www.aisecure.net