From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 12 08:15:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF7116A420 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:15:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladimir.terziev@sun-fish.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [62.176.125.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759A343D69 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:15:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladimir.terziev@sun-fish.com) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740C134174; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:14:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sun-fish.com (fs.cmotd.com [192.168.3.253]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC6D34164 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:14:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sun-fish.com (localhost.cmotd.com [127.0.0.1]) by sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C278138406 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:14:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daemon.cmotd.com (daemon.cmotd.com [192.168.3.104]) by sun-fish.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E48338404 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:14:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:14:57 +0300 From: Vladimir Terziev To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20051012111457.17eacc99.vlady@sun-fish.com> In-Reply-To: <434C427D.40501@netfence.it> References: <200510111202.j9BC2obf081876@freefall.freebsd.org> <434C427D.40501@netfence.it> Organization: SunFish Ltd., Sofia X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.1 (GTK+ 2.4.0; i386-unknown-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV X-AV-Checked: ClamAV SF1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:45:04 +0000 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:15:05 -0000 Ok, i think the FreeBSD team should isolate all statically linked applications which are part of the operating system and which depend on OpenSSL. They must be re-build (not the whole operating system) in order OpenSSL changes to be applyed to them. Statically linked ports are responsibility of the person who installed them. Vladimir On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 00:53:49 +0200 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: > > > Note that any statically linked applications that are not part of the > > base system (i.e. from the Ports Collection or other 3rd-party sources) > > must be recompiled. > > Ok, is there any way to list installed ports which are statically linked > against OpenSSL? > > bye & Thanks > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"