From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 7 10:15:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C58F16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:15:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [66.234.138.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633DA43FEA for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:15:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chuck@pkix.net) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (dpvc-68-161-244-25.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.244.25]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA7IFcEC095725 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:15:39 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) In-Reply-To: <200311071800.hA7I0gnW006483@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200311071800.hA7I0gnW006483@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <63CF9A6D-114E-11D8-AD24-003065ABFD92@pkix.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:15:38 -0500 To: ports@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on pi.codefab.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: sysutils/clean_ X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:15:51 -0000 On Nov 7, 2003, at 1:00 PM, Bill "distfiles" Fenner wrote: > Dear chuck@pkix.net, > > You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port > whose distfiles [or main web pages] are not fetchable from their > MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/chuck@pkix.net.html > > and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with > a problem is sysutils/clean_. Hi, all-- To recap: the port as submitted works fine, but the name 'clean' broke the generation of the ports INDEX. I believe the port was renamed in CVS via a repocopy to 'clean_', while Oliver Eikemeier kindly looked into and produced a patch to bsd.port.subdir.mk which seemed to resolve the bug with generating INDEX. What I should do next to address Bill Fenner's scripted email...? :-) -- -Chuck