From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Apr 27 11:35:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09846 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 11:35:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from red.csi.cam.ac.uk (exim@red.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA09839 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 11:35:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bjc23@hermes.cam.ac.uk) Received: from bjc23 (helo=localhost) by red.csi.cam.ac.uk with local-smtp (Exim 1.90 #1) for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org id 0yTskG-0000Ap-00; Mon, 27 Apr 1998 19:35:16 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 19:35:16 +0100 (BST) From: Ben Cohen X-Sender: bjc23@red.csi.cam.ac.uk Reply-To: bjc23@hermes.cam.ac.uk To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Why is Win NT slower than others? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi! Why is Windows NT Server slower than other servers such as FreeBSD? Is there anything in the argument that this could be because Windows NT Server is graphical (it uses the Win95 interface) whereas BSD isn't [need not be]? Is it because of inefficient programming by Microsoft? (I've read that they use basically the same TCP/IP programming as BSD.) Ben. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message