From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jan 23 15:40:30 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA20003
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:40:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19993
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id PAA21844; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:40:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701232340.PAA21844@austin.polstra.com>
To: Andrew Stesin <stesin@gu.net>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Fault-tolerant network with 2 ethernets 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Jan 1997 13:08:08 +0200."
             <Pine.BSI.3.95.970123130426.24487S-100000@creator.gu.kiev.ua> 
References: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970123130426.24487S-100000@creator.gu.kiev.ua> 
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:40:06 -0800
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Andrew,

> Use Gated and OSPF.  It will even do some kind of load-sharing
> then, you will get kinda of 20Mb between the hosts included into
> the structure.

Thanks a lot for suggesting this.  I didn't know much about gated or
OSPF before, but I studied them this morning.  I think they'll be
perfect for this problem.

Also, thanks for your very generous offer to help further!  If I run
into trouble or confusion, I'll let you know.

Regards,
John