Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jan 1996 20:50:45 -0800 (PST)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu>
To:        Anthony Hill <ahill@interconnect.com.au>
Cc:        Luis Verissimo <licau@ebs08.eb.uah.edu>, questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Need recomendation on http server
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960128204944.4291Q-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960127093530.2857B-100000@tulpi.interconnect.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Jan 1996, Anthony Hill wrote:

> I have used apache, and NCSA 4.0/4.1, both were easy to install and 
> setup, apache is in the ports collection, and NCSA installs with no 
> modifications. I used NCSA as a deamon and from inetd, but have only used 
> apache as a deamon - the docs recommend against using apache from inetd.
> (Anyone know why ?)

Apache can manage multiple connections better than inetd can -- Apache 
spawns off 4 or so instances; inetd spawns 1 for every connection, which 
can get costly in terms of time and memory.

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@gladstone.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960128204944.4291Q-100000>