Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:23:40 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: * Re: Horrible installer Message-ID: <CAHu1Y70=Z66ZM712EgsdsZX15YOBPM1D2EbrTuvcJ93q30s5iw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120121071331.GA32682@hemlock.hydra> References: <BLU160-W54C133B8003EF140C41EF7AE860@phx.gbl> <4F180C83.9090100@my.gd> <4F19279F.6060303@a1poweruser.com> <201201202243.01861.koggybsd@comcast.net> <45C8C855-AA1F-4F9E-A274-29F6D92E5DB8@fisglobal.com> <20120121071331.GA32682@hemlock.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote: > ... On the other hand, bsdinstall does get the job done, at least for my > purposes. =A0It just does so in a way that feels a bit more > straightjacketed, and it rubs me personally a bit the wrong way. =A0... >From my perspective, it replaces something that clearly had at least a decimal order of magnitude more time and effort put into it, and it again makes FreeBSD look like a hobbyist's OS. As you point out, once installed, it has its merits. ;-) - M
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y70=Z66ZM712EgsdsZX15YOBPM1D2EbrTuvcJ93q30s5iw>