From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 8 09:20:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F2C1065670 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5892C8FC0C for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q189K5O6058681 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:20:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q189K5Bq058680; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:20:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:20:05 GMT Message-Id: <201202080920.q189K5Bq058680@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: Eugene Grosbein Cc: Subject: Re: kern/161899: [route] ntpd(8): Repeating RTM_MISS packets causing high CPU load for ntpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugene Grosbein List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:20:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/161899; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eugene Grosbein To: Steven Hartland Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/161899: [route] ntpd(8): Repeating RTM_MISS packets causing high CPU load for ntpd Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:13:27 +0700 08.02.2012 03:30, Steven Hartland пишет: > The following reply was made to PR kern/161899; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: "Steven Hartland" > To: > Cc: > Subject: Re: kern/161899: [route] ntpd(8): Repeating RTM_MISS packets causing high CPU load for ntpd > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 09:24:47 -0000 > > Any update on this, would have been nice to see a fix hit before > 9.0. If you need any more information please let me know. This is known problem. You should remove "options FLOWTABLE" from your kernel configuration, as it was removed from GENERIC for such misbehaviours. That had fixed same problem for me. Eugene Grosbein