From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Sep 17 13:09:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA15434 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 13:09:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA15420 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 13:09:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA29346; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 13:09:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Don Wilde cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Intel initiative In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Sep 1998 13:06:06 -0000." <3601093E.5D55F9C8@Partsnow.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 13:09:55 -0700 Message-ID: <29342.906062995@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't know of anyone working on it. If someone wishes to, the field appears open! :-) - Jordan > Hi, Jordan - > > http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?980916.ecminer.htm > > from this week's 'Scoop' talks about an Intel driver-compatibility > initiative that's supposedly 'supported by the Linux community.' Are we > on the inside on this? We can't afford to be shut out like we have been > with I2O. > -- > oooOOO O O O o * * * * * * > o ___ _________ _________ ________ _________ _________ ___==_ > V_=_=_DW ===--- Don Wilde [don@PartsNow.com] [http://www.PartsNow.com ] > /oo0000oo-oo--oo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo--ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-oo--oo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message