Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:31:55 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc:        d@delphij.net, freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Update firefox to 2.0.0.10
Message-ID:  <474DB41B.7010901@marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.t2ih041u9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References:  <474C993B.4060706@delphij.net> <1196233491.75142.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <op.t2ih041u9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 01:04:51 -0600, Joe Marcus Clarke
> <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 14:24 -0800, Xin LI wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is a patch that updates firefox to 2.0.0.10 to address
>>> CVE-2007-5959.
>>
>> Approved.
> 
> Can you hold on this one? It looks like 2.0.0.10 break more things than
> it fixes. I saw this page:
> 
> http://www.neowin.net/news/main/07/11/28/firefox-20010-gaffe-prompts-quick-fix
> 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405584
> 
> One of us will have to dig to find patch or we can create security patch
> instead update it to 2.0.0.10.

Looks like this should fix it.  Can someone run a quick test?  I'll try
and get to it myself.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=284556

Joe

> 
> Cheers,
> Mezz
> 
>> Joe
> 
> 


- --
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHTbP1b2iPiv4Uz4cRAqO2AJ9CQJ1tz9a8PF6iibMKUhYGM+4xVwCgnjii
+uyvTotHAcRtjbSGaWaB9m0=
=IUv5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?474DB41B.7010901>