Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 22:43:47 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r471061 - head/audio/qjackctl Message-ID: <20180528204347.GR25490@fc.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <98af2999-1d85-8c39-cb0f-62d4ba881dd7@freebsd.org> References: <201805281845.w4SIj8bO065379@repo.freebsd.org> <77503afc-b631-ac32-a87b-c8a28e0bb2ab@freebsd.org> <d42ac45a-2357-630a-8a0d-6864f271d4a9@freebsd.org> <2187524.aIfrmmm1E6@beastie.bionicmutton.org> <98af2999-1d85-8c39-cb0f-62d4ba881dd7@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > On 05/28/18 13:10, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > Note that actively deprecating Qt4 is something that will take months, in > > order to allow users to make a smooth transition -- and it is something that > > needs to be discussed at length (and probably elsewhere than this list). > > The question here is rather: Do we need to support people who want to > stay with Qt4, and not have Qt5? > Because that's what is asked here. The question is also: Do we want to force the qt5 update on users that do not expect it and had not time to test ? -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180528204347.GR25490>