From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon May 28 20:43:54 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B12FAFA8A for ; Mon, 28 May 2018 20:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D152F84F6A; Mon, 28 May 2018 20:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1fNOzb-00007c-UD; Mon, 28 May 2018 22:43:47 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 22:43:47 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Yuri Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r471061 - head/audio/qjackctl Message-ID: <20180528204347.GR25490@fc.opsec.eu> References: <201805281845.w4SIj8bO065379@repo.freebsd.org> <77503afc-b631-ac32-a87b-c8a28e0bb2ab@freebsd.org> <2187524.aIfrmmm1E6@beastie.bionicmutton.org> <98af2999-1d85-8c39-cb0f-62d4ba881dd7@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <98af2999-1d85-8c39-cb0f-62d4ba881dd7@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 20:43:54 -0000 Hi! > On 05/28/18 13:10, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > Note that actively deprecating Qt4 is something that will take months, in > > order to allow users to make a smooth transition -- and it is something that > > needs to be discussed at length (and probably elsewhere than this list). > > The question here is rather: Do we need to support people who want to > stay with Qt4, and not have Qt5? > Because that's what is asked here. The question is also: Do we want to force the qt5 update on users that do not expect it and had not time to test ? -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 2 years to go !