From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 10:19:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09FE511 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F528FC08 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA28912; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TcvmO-000Lil-Tf; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:08 +0200 Message-ID: <50B3421B.2010606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:19:07 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Lamaiziere Subject: Re: Some new hardware with 9.1 does not reboot easily References: <50ACA518.4050309@digiware.nl> <50ACEEFF.8010001@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0A20.2070408@digiware.nl> <50AD0AC2.5070804@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0B29.6060602@FreeBSD.org> <50AD0F00.5020600@digiware.nl> <50AD13EE.8050901@digiware.nl> <50AD17E4.50104@FreeBSD.org> <50AD189D.4040902@digiware.nl> <50AD1941.2020108@FreeBSD.org> <50ADF362.2040803@FreeBSD.org> <20121123140932.3a6deff6@mr129166> <50AF88AA.1060003@FreeBSD.org> <50AFF419.3070604@digiware.nl> <50AFF7C1.2090405@FreeBSD.org> <50AFFB9C.8050101@digiware.nl> <20121126111052.68136d00@mr129166> In-Reply-To: <20121126111052.68136d00@mr129166> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" , Willem Jan Withagen X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:19:13 -0000 on 26/11/2012 12:10 Patrick Lamaiziere said the following: > As far I can see it fails because there is no getnewvnode_reserve() > / get_newvnode_drop_reserve() in 9.1. The patch is for stable/9. -- Andriy Gapon