Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:14:20 +0000 From: Max Brazhnikov <makc@freebsd.org> To: danfe@freebsd.org Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r483153 - in head/graphics/fraqtive: . files Message-ID: <CAJie3yr69Za_j%2BHx3npqPoZ4zS%2BCX9h6rkp-fkYbrKc%2B=_kgMw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20181027180632.GA52560@FreeBSD.org> References: <201810271715.w9RHFEf0024510@repo.freebsd.org> <20181027180632.GA52560@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 18:06, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 05:15:14PM +0000, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > New Revision: 483153 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/483153 > > > > Log: > > graphics/fraqtive: > > - Switch to Qt 5 > > Since there were no version bump, I assume that the port could be built > against any Qt version => you should consider converting it to flavors, > since not everyone loves/wants Qt 5. Yes, your assumption is correct. I would make both Qt 4 and Qt 5 a couple of years ago, but considering the approach of Qt 4 deprecation in ports I prefer to not bother about it now (at least for leaf ports, like this one). > > Also, what happens if both Qt versions are installed? I didn't see how > this situation is handled in the commit diff. Nothing is required in this case. You run either Qt 4 qmake or Qt 5 one for configure - that's all.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJie3yr69Za_j%2BHx3npqPoZ4zS%2BCX9h6rkp-fkYbrKc%2B=_kgMw>