From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar  3 23:53:35 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DF31065670;
	Thu,  3 Mar 2011 23:53:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:53:25 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <201103032322.p23NM69A022273@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<201103031835.00657.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<4D702793.5090307@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D702793.5090307@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201103031853.27495.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/java/openjdk6 Makefile
	ports/java/openjdk6/files patch-set
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:53:35 -0000

On Thursday 03 March 2011 06:43 pm, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 15:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 March 2011 06:27 pm, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> Does this relate to
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153301 at all?
> >
> > It does.  I back-ported the fix because I was too tired of
> > hearing "IPv6 and web plugin does not work together" non-sense.
> > :-(
>
> Well in my case it's not nonsense. :)  I have an IPv6 connection,
> and even for sites that have no IPv6 address the plugin failed.

Actually, it's backward, i.e., it fails because the site does not have 
IPv6 address. ;-)

> Are you saying that now I can enable the IPV6 OPTION and have the
> java plugin work? Will it actually work over IPv6 transport?

Yes, it should.

Jung-uk Kim