Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 21:21:46 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Processor affinity? Message-ID: <199902150521.VAA12394@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9902142047020.29164-100000@feral-gw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> maintain reasonable balancing across the system), but doesn't make much
:> sense if you only have 2-4.
:>
:> Note that processor affinity scheduling is different from hard-assigning
:> a process to a processor. Even so, there are very few circumstances where
:> even hard-assigning will do a better job then letting the scheduler do it.
:>
:
:Doesn't it also really depend upon the cache architecture?
Not particularly.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902150521.VAA12394>