From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 21:46:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EE3106566C for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E028FC12 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so1946701vcb.13 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :x-kmail-markup:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:x-gm-message-state; bh=wAzZ06yJg2+vkGzgv4KrIw+LqrVFXBatBUsC8FBQoxA=; b=OQc0rlKjsTNoFwab8/EQsYIsoOROk5K8TwsQjSyOnGiu13WNjzXles7M56k40whR4L In8cSjpWR/KHcaqmYkvCA4FhioQTKcMu6tatAelueq/LMYy4PrZiMOMVZAelgNShQbeo Y11BQpXATvglpX7G3eF1lliHy+yVbVv920sZkyD+gP5qR9XwMRxcJzFJJSVA34C6ZODx bGlMCVv5KNsUXlAFnoJAktrsMrRVtr/8mngDOU1/KURmWUHfIHGYfULYh/ibhUIEjyf+ DJqo4L/MqaoI9rLqzb289+lXagMDBjoedz9Dj6Z5ml0kmdY7ouKZ053RghOkvqlPAS78 fN5A== Received: by 10.220.214.8 with SMTP id gy8mr4231864vcb.45.1338587183305; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([177.134.157.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m14sm4970913vdh.4.2012.06.01.14.46.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:46:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:46:51 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <9E.12.15580.45168CF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> In-Reply-To: <9E.12.15580.45168CF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201206011846.51116.lobo@bsd.com.br> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVDJzgZy322i7tMYGxEvW2J2gHUS0IwnFGYStAaaTYcqP5dxeSLXN9SMpUESGRAumzX355 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 21:46:25 -0000 On Friday 01 June 2012 03:29:40 Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I ddon't see any advantage in FreeBSD 8.x or earlier. Well, I still see complains about a few quirks in 9 here in the list, specially after certain src updates. Re:Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148 Re: kern/168190: [pf] panic when using pf and route-to (maybe: bad fragment handling?) Re: ULE/sched issues on stable/9 - why isn't preemption occurring? Etc .. To me, something like pf (specially route-to!) is critical and for the moment, I wouldn't touch my rock-solid-down-to-the-micro-second perfect production firewall 8-STABLE server for nothing, if the aim is such a role. I think that distribution set size is just not a very strong argument. OTOH, if the aim is just experimenting, that's another story. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE)