From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov  8 10:57:04 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C62716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  8 Nov 2004 10:57:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (ux11.ltcm.net [64.215.98.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6865943D1F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  8 Nov 2004 10:57:03 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from mipam@ibb.net)
Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (mipam@localhost.ltcm.net [IPv6:::1])
	by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/UX11TT) with ESMTP id iA8Av1S7008452
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:57:02 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (mipam@localhost)
	by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id iA8Av0sB005816
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:57:00 +0100 (MET)
X-Authentication-Warning: ux11.ltcm.net: mipam owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:56:59 +0100 (MET)
From: Mipam <mipam@ibb.net>
X-X-Sender: mipam@ux11.ltcm.net
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0411081155070.6146@ux11.ltcm.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: preemption stable under 5.3?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:57:04 -0000

Hi,

Is the preemption stable under 5.3 release?
Can i savely enable it under 5.3? Latest i heard that in combination
with the ule scheduler it didnt work well  and wasnt stable.
Bye,

Mipam.