From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Oct 18 22:33:42 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id WAA03385
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 22:33:42 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA03366
          ; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 22:33:38 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id WAA02385; Wed, 18 Oct 1995 22:33:21 -0700
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 22:33:21 -0700
Message-Id: <199510190533.WAA02385@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: ache@astral.msk.su
CC: dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au, davidg@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org,
        jkh@freefall.FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <DnOSSXmaz3@ache.dialup.demos.ru>
Subject: Re: xterm dumps core
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * >I'm using to a clean install of the 2.1.0-951005-SNAP binary set, not
 * >one I built myself.  It has only the old names, and not the new names.
 * >Is that SNAP incorrect in this regard?  What will be in the 2.1.0 release?
 * 
 * I don't involved in SNAPs build so can't answer this question...
 * Maybe Jordan or David can?

Well I can.  Jordan and David are too busy to read this. :)

 * In any case I saw this changes commited to 2.1.0, maybe after this SNAP
 * date...

You are right, it went in after the 1005 snap.

Satoshi