From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 22:55:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15A516A468; Sat, 19 May 2007 22:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7C213C455; Sat, 19 May 2007 22:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8521A3C19; Sat, 19 May 2007 15:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 75A61513AD; Sat, 19 May 2007 18:55:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 18:55:51 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sergey Kovalev Message-ID: <20070519225551.GA7106@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <209684.35062.qm@web51403.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <464F6424.7070606@locolomo.org> <464F68A8.4010802@u.washington.edu> <464F7483.5040104@mail.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <464F7483.5040104@mail.mipt.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Xorg 7.2.0 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 22:55:52 -0000 On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:04:51AM +0400, Sergey Kovalev wrote: > Garrett Cooper wrote: > >(sorry for cross-posting, but this is relevant to ports@ too) > > > >Please be aware that the portsnap snapshot hasn't been updated yet to > >include the X.org 7.2 addition, if you use portsnap. I need to try cvsup > >as well to see if the modifications outstanding with the cvsup servers too. > > I'm going to try upgrading ports tree via portsnap tomorrow. > I wonder is it safe to fetch changes via portsnap since I don't exactly > know if there is great difference between csup and portsnap from Xorg > upgrade perspective. It should be fine to use portsnap (right now portsnap has not yet imported all the changes, but it should only need another hour or two). > Sorry for my english. Your English is very good! Kris