From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 7 22:12:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28061065671 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) Received: from mail.netconsonance.com (mail.netconsonance.com [198.207.204.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2458FC13 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) Received: from 4.151.178.10.in-addr.arpa (m420e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.14.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netconsonance.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m57MBppJ062988; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netconsonance.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=3.5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44, AWL=-0.177, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.617] Message-Id: <4004D1C8-58E4-46E7-B735-4F1CDC5BCCB4@netconsonance.com> From: Jo Rhett To: "Patrick M. Hausen" In-Reply-To: <20080607204408.GA39103@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:11:42 -0700 References: <4846E14C.709@FreeBSD.org> <48472CCF.8080101@FreeBSD.org> <4847EF62.1070709@rxsec.com> <4847F814.10409@FreeBSD.org> <4847FB1D.1050400@rxsec.com> <4847FFDE.8000209@FreeBSD.org> <48480473.3010009@rxsec.com> <484808B8.8070506@FreeBSD.org> <5CCF0D6E-56C1-4EBD-B8A6-955311F7851E@netconsonance.com> <20080607204408.GA39103@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924) Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:12:02 -0000 On Jun 7, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Upgrading your systems to 6.3 takes _precisely_ the same amount > of work as upgrading to "6-STABLE as of today 00:00 GMT". No, it doesn't. You can get to 6.3 with freebsd-update. And you can stay patched with freebsd-update on a -RELEASE. For a corporation to choose to stick with -RELEASE makes perfect sense, and it specifically what the -RELEASE versions were intended for. > You may want to pick a different point of time, but it really > doesn't matter, because a release _is_ just a CVS branch created > at a certain time. >> This is why EoLing 6.2 and forcing people to upgrade to a release >> with lots of known issues is a problem. > > People who have issues with RELENG_6_3 should upgrade to RELENG_6 > which is perfectly supported. I'm sorry, but you clearly don't run RELENG_6 on anything. I run it on two home computers, and grabbing it on any given day and trying to run with it in production is insanity. Lots and lots of things are committed, reverted, recommitted, reverted and then finally redesigned. Each of those steps are often committed to the source tree. The -RELEASE versions prevent this kind of insanity. I'm struggling to find a phrase here that can't be taken to be an insult, so forgive me and try to understand when I say that you really should try watching the cvs tree for a bit before making a nonsense comment like that. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness