Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:08:37 +0200 From: Sergio Carlavilla <carlavilla@freebsd.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <etnapierala@gmail.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Doubts with linux base-c7 status in arm64 Message-ID: <CAFwocyP6a7unaQ6NUhWSeg-0WKbfY4PWZUtroV8Bd2Q_gu=OZg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <22F49D64-AEB2-478C-8CEE-EAA0BFBB6D3F@gmail.com> References: <CAFwocyNJQmzNXQjScgmvnDXuDpwzYKGm7ErCsxUOWCHn%2BNEyVg@mail.gmail.com> <22F49D64-AEB2-478C-8CEE-EAA0BFBB6D3F@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 17:17, Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a <etnapierala@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 11 Apr 2023, at 18:49, Sergio Carlavilla <carlavilla@freebsd.org> wr= ote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Can you please tell me if the note here[1] is still true? > > I took a look in [2] and seems there's support for arm64 > > Yup - I=E2=80=99ve just tried it on arm64, and yeah, the package is there= , > so this seems to be no longer true. Will you do the honors? :) > Thanks, we're preparing a rework for the chapter, I'll upgrade then. Thanks again!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFwocyP6a7unaQ6NUhWSeg-0WKbfY4PWZUtroV8Bd2Q_gu=OZg>