From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 23 18:36:31 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADFD1065670;
	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:36:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jon.otterholm@ide.resurscentrum.se)
Received: from mail1.cil.se (mail1.cil.se [217.197.56.125])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227818FC14;
	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:36:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 192.168.98.96 ([192.168.98.96]) by edusrv05.edu.irc.local
	([192.168.44.14]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; 
	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:36:56 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.0.0.071130
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:36:28 +0100
From: Jon Otterholm <jon.otterholm@ide.resurscentrum.se>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>,
	<freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <C7CEC8BC.2493D%jon.otterholm@ide.resurscentrum.se>
Thread-Topic: Choosing CPU for router
Thread-Index: AcrKt7/ZJY7ZPQ6nPUmJ8JdpZ0Kd1A==
In-Reply-To: <hoaen6$1cv$1@dough.gmane.org>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Choosing CPU for router
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:36:31 -0000




Den 2010-03-23 14.12, skrev "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org>:

> On 03/18/10 01:32, Andrew Snow wrote:
>> 
>> Jon Otterholm wrote:
>>> This machine is going to act as access-router serving ~500
>>> FTTH-customers.
>>> About 500Mbit/s and 200kpps. The big issue is Dummynet, around 1000
>>> pipes (2
>>> pipes/customer).
>> 
>> That doesn't sound right, 200kpps @ 500Mbps works out to an average
>> packet size of 250 bytes? Am I missing something
> 
> Maybe he's pushing VoIP...

Today we are pushing ~0,4kpps/Mbit. At the same ratio 500Mbit/s sums up to
~200kpps.

//JO