From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 11 02:21:45 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F219E532;
 Sat, 11 Jan 2014 02:21:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7B015F6;
 Sat, 11 Jan 2014 02:21:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.2.117] (unknown [121.54.112.185])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D43833F469;
 Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:21:36 -0500 (EST)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXjmxQOs9Rj3exmjXRwFvSCSn-fx1bM2t3-tNchuyJqoBJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFYkXjmxQOs9Rj3exmjXRwFvSCSn-fx1bM2t3-tNchuyJqoBJQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC5 AMD64 pkg upgrade fail by gcc/gcc46
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 10:18:37 +0800
To: CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>,
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <c58b9c7d-5acc-43ca-992c-abc34aea5cdc@email.android.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 02:21:45 -0000

Wait a minute: is one of yoir ports hard coding lang/gcc46 instead of doing USE_GCC? If so, here is the bug. 

Gerald