From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 11:09:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D890716A41F for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9906213C447 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FC420A6; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:09:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F5120A5; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:09:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 22C7F56FE; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 13:09:33 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" References: <200706051316.l55DGSU0052272@lurza.secnetix.de> <86ps49l5pc.fsf@dwp.des.no> <499c70c0706060351x17d76eb2ge719c605cfa49e50@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:09:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <499c70c0706060351x17d76eb2ge719c605cfa49e50@mail.gmail.com> (Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri's message of "Wed\, 6 Jun 2007 13\:51\:17 +0300") Message-ID: <866461l4pf.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:09:29 -0000 "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" writes: > So switching to AMD64 arch would boot MySQL performance for my case 2 > cores and 2 GB of ram? Most likely, yes. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no