From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 8 02:09:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C052816A402 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 02:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from casper@web.am) Received: from mx1.web.am (mx1.web.am [217.113.0.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BFD43D46 for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 02:09:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from casper@web.am) Received: from antispam (localhost.web.am [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FA661C1E for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 07:09:14 +0500 (AMST) Received: from localhost (localhost.web.am [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A127861C0E; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 07:09:13 +0500 (AMST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [217.113.1.123]) by mx1.web.am (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636EA61C05; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 07:09:13 +0500 (AMST) Message-ID: <44371B4F.5090504@web.am> Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 07:09:19 +0500 From: Gaspar Chilingarov Organization: Netter Ltd. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060329) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on mx1.web.am X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: /sys/i386/acpica/acpi_machdep.c - source code clarification needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 02:09:26 -0000 Hi! I'm trying to implement acpi support (I'm interested in s3 level) on amd64 platform and now working on porting code from i386. I'm really missing something why there are apm device creation and emulation in acpi_machdep.c? Is it to provide some apm-compatible way to view battery information or it's used (in some hidden way) for some other purposes elsewhere? Also I would like ask some of gurus and acpi developers to let me know who should contacted with implementation questions -- this may be offlist communication :) x-posted in freebsd-acpi,freebsd-current. Thanks in advance, Gaspar Chilingarov