Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:16:21 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org>, Giovanni Trematerra <gianni@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: improve cx_lowest logic Message-ID: <4FFFD955.9030200@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAL409Ky6qmeBUaTeCqrRcvYEH%2BgDUqqUgvpFiKSCt2d361j64g@mail.gmail.com> References: <4FF95F79.30309@FreeBSD.org> <CAL409Ky6qmeBUaTeCqrRcvYEH%2BgDUqqUgvpFiKSCt2d361j64g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 10/07/2012 19:30 Vitaly Magerya said the following: > Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: >> I would like to propose the following change for review and testing: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff > > I just tested this on a laptop that jumps between reporting only > C1, C1 and C2, and C1 through C3; in all cases your patch does > the right thing, so this removes the need for kludges I had to > do earlier; thank you, Andriy. > > Will you also change how /etc/rc.d/power_profile selects > lowest_value? It currently uses the maximum from dev.cpu.0.cx_supported, > but with your patch it'll be the right thing to simply use Cmax. I've put this on my to do list. Hope to commit this trivial change soon-ish. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FFFD955.9030200>