From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat May 10 12:47:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA18561
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 10 May 1997 12:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cedb.dpcsys.com (cedb.DPCSYS.com [209.25.4.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA18556
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 10 May 1997 12:47:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (dan@localhost) by cedb.dpcsys.com (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id TAA08557; Sat, 10 May 1997 19:46:01 GMT
Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 12:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com>
To: Snob Art Genre <ben@narcissus.ml.org>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SuperMicro P6DNF 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.970510123010.23732B-100000@narcissus.ml.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.UW2.3.95.970510124347.8187B-100000@cedb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 10 May 1997, Snob Art Genre wrote:
> I thought the [uw]tmp changes were between 2.1.x and 2.2.  Hence all the X
> problems with 2.2.  Am I wrong?

I thought they were caused by 3.0 stuff sneaking into early 2.2
I could be wrong, but my 2.2.0 only takes 8 char logins.

Dan
-- 
 Dan Busarow                                                  714 443 4172
 DPC Systems / Beach.Net                                    dan@dpcsys.com
 Dana Point, California  83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4   8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82