From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 13:17:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 169684A2 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:17:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B852DE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAIDHF6r044346 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:17:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195121] graphics/linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf: rename to -pixbuf2 to avoid conflating with 0.22.0 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:17:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: xmj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:17:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195121 --- Comment #11 from Johannes Jost Meixner --- > Why that is a problem? I haven't found a single linux- port that depends on libgdk_pixbuf.so.2 provided by gdk-pixbuf among both f10 and c6. Yeah, it isn't. I didn't know about gdk-pixbuf(1!) being a GNOME 1 "vestige". Just to make sure I understand the versions/provisioning of things correctly: * with linux-f10, linux-f10-gdk-pixbuf is GNOME1 and hence really old. * with linux-f10, gdk-pixbuf2 is provided by linux-f10-gtk2 * with linux-c6 (6.6 but not 6.5), gdk-pixbuf2 is provided by linux-c6-gdk-pixbuf * no linux-c6 port (so far) provides gdk-pixbuf (1!), and none seems needed ? Does that sound right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.