Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:12:37 +0200 From: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org> To: Aaron Dalton <aaron@daltons.ca> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/87590: Update Port: devel/p5-AI-Pathfinding-AStar 0.03 -> 0.04 Message-ID: <20051018141237.GF77678@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <435501D5.4010800@daltons.ca> References: <200510180916.j9I9GR35024594@freefall.freebsd.org> <435501D5.4010800@daltons.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:08:21AM -0600, Aaron Dalton wrote: > Anton Berezin wrote: > >Synopsis: Update Port: devel/p5-AI-Pathfinding-AStar 0.03 -> 0.04 > > > >State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > >State-Changed-By: tobez > >State-Changed-When: Tue Oct 18 11:15:24 CEST 2005 > >State-Changed-Why: > >Have you tried to test this module without either Heap::Simple::Perl or > >Heap::Simple::XS installed? > > > >To rephrase - it is unusable if you just install this port on a fresh > >machine. > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87590 > > No, because Heap::Simple doesn't function without ::XS or ::Perl. That > is clearly (I believe) announced in pkg_msg. I'm not sure what other > approach to take. Any ideas would be warmly welcomed. One way would be to actually install one of those as a dependency, so that we get a useful port out of the box. Which one, I am not sure. On the one hand, ::Perl is more portable. On the other hand, ::XS is faster and we can basically guarantee that a C compiler is there and that the module works. So, I would probably go for ::XS as a dependency of p5-Heap-Simple, if that's alright with you? \Anton. -- An undefined problem has an infinite number of solutions. -- Robert A. Humphrey
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051018141237.GF77678>