Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 23:40:09 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Danny Thomas <D.Thomas@vthrc.uq.edu.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tech-userlevel@netbsd.org Subject: Re: Swap overcommit Message-ID: <378DF2C9.62BF4D81@newsguy.com> References: <v02140b06b3b283d51ab3@[130.102.4.80]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Danny Thomas wrote: > > >Killing the biggest is simple to implement and usually right. > ... but some people don't want that policy, at least on some of their > systems. Does FreeBSD offer alternatives? Is so, they've been conspicuously > absent from discussion, which might have taken things into a more > productive vein. What do other over-committing systems offer? Absent, eh? FreeBSD offers soft and hard limits on resources. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Would you like to go out with me?" "I'd love to." "Oh, well, n... err... would you?... ahh... huh... what do I do next?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?378DF2C9.62BF4D81>