From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  5 13:41:31 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE29EE3;
 Thu,  5 Sep 2013 13:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl
 [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1:222:4dff:fe55:4ccb])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7C22F44;
 Thu,  5 Sep 2013 13:41:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [IPv6:::1])
 by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r85DfPsv096185;
 Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:41:26 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Authentication-Results: bela.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=none header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
Message-Id: <201309051341.r85DfPsv096185@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.org>, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/178262: [patch] dns/unbound,
 dns/ldns: openssl port iff base version < 1.0
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-reply-to: <1UXCEE-0007yS-1X@internal.tormail.org>
References: <1UXCEE-0007yS-1X@internal.tormail.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Jan Beich <jbeich@tormail.org>
 message dated "Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:53:48 +0500."
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:41:25 +0200
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 MISSING_MID autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on bela.nlnetlabs.nl
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:41:27 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:41:31 -0000

Oops, forgot about this.

    >Description:
    Do not depend on security/openssl if openssl in base is sufficient.

I did actually tested this for ldns and it seems OK.

I'm not maintaining the unbound port so cannot speak for him, but I
assume he won't have a problem with it either.

	jaap