Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 15:57:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258846] devel/dyncall: unbreak on arm Message-ID: <bug-258846-7788-90k9RiGduq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-258846-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-258846-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258846 --- Comment #2 from Robert Clausecker <fuz@fuz.su> --- (In reply to Tassilo Philipp from comment #1) Hi Tassilo, ARM does not normally use % sigils for registers and I think gas just accep= ts them out of courtesy. Clang's assembler on the other hand is a lot stricte= r.=20 I none of your other arm assembly source files in your projects have them, = so I wonder why this one file diverges. Also consider migrating to UAL (.syntax unified) if possible. This'll avoi= d a lot of headache in the future. It is possible that your clang is configured to use the GNU assembler for assembly files. As for the patches, I can confirm that the resulting code also assembles wh= en using gcc/GNU as. > I'm not sure about the use of hooking up the test suite *in its current s= tate*, as some test executables do not return any meaningful status codes. = This is also on my list to fix. Of course this should be hooked up eventual= ly, so you did the right thing, I just think the suite needs some changes, = first. The test suite is not ran automatically by any part of the package building process. Setting TEST_TARGET simply means that it is possible to run "make test" on the port. However, if you don't feel comfortable with that, there= 's no problem leaving it out. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-258846-7788-90k9RiGduq>