From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 17:37:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F082616A4CE; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:37:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB6A43D66; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:37:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from [212.227.126.209] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Af848-0005C9-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:37:28 +0100 Received: from [80.132.227.119] (helo=Gatekeeper.FreeBSD.org) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Af848-0005Of-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:37:28 +0100 Received: from StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org (StefanEsser [192.168.0.10]) by Gatekeeper.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AA75F18; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:37:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org (Postfix, from userid 200) id A9C762428; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:37:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:37:09 +0100 From: Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=DFer?= To: Sean Farley Message-ID: <20040110013709.GA1810@StefanEsser.FreeBSD.org> References: <1073582974.37229.8.camel@herring.nlsystems.com> <20040109113432.R1511@thor.farley.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109113432.R1511@thor.farley.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:fa3fae9b6ca38d745862a668565919f6 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:37:44 -0000 On 2004-01-09 11:38 -0600, Sean Farley wrote: > I admit to having not tried it, but I wonder how well OpenCM > (http://www.opencm.org/) would compare. I think it would have a smaller > footprint than Subversion. I have prepared a port of OpenCM, but didn't have time to test it, yet. For that reason, I have not yet imported it into the ports repository. Just in case somebody wants to test OpenCM (or my port ;-) Regards, STefan