From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 12 01:25:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA18817 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 01:25:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ocean.campus.luth.se (ocean.campus.luth.se [130.240.194.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA18802 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 01:25:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se) Received: (from karpen@localhost) by ocean.campus.luth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA03393; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:14:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from karpen) From: Mikael Karpberg Message-Id: <199808120814.KAA03393@ocean.campus.luth.se> Subject: Re: Possible security "risk" in ftp client In-Reply-To: <199808120402.WAA04333@harmony.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Aug 11, 98 10:02:30 pm" To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 10:14:24 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Warner Losh: > My biggest complaint about ps is that if someone does a ps while our > PPP server is dialing up the remote host, then they get to see what > our phone number and password are... :-( I would welcome privacy > enhancements in this area. Instead of changing "ftp", would it not be better to change ppp and ftp as has been mentioned before? (Make them call setproctitle(3), IIRC?) /Mikael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message