From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 27 11:38:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0847106566B; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.ipv6.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:6:c:20d:56ff:fe6f:f935]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEB88FC0C; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C922A1CC76; Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:38:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:38:46 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: Stanislav Sedov Message-ID: <20100327113846.GO18698@droso.net> References: <201003261123.o2QBNGZT002851@repoman.freebsd.org> <4BACAE9B.4060800@kovesdan.org> <20100326233439.GA28984@lonesome.com> <20100326193949.bd1e6ea2.stas@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dIV3CY5swYZsO92m" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100326193949.bd1e6ea2.stas@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 7.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Mark Linimon , Gabor Kovesdan , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/rar Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:38:47 -0000 --dIV3CY5swYZsO92m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:39:49PM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:34:39 -0500 > Mark Linimon mentioned: >=20 > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:39:51PM +0545, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > > > It would be nice to receive a failure notification about such things.= I =20 > > > didn't get anything neither for this one nor for the previous one. Th= ese =20 > > > notifications worked before and there were no commits like this witho= ut =20 > > > notifying the maintainer. > >=20 > > I guess I've erred on the side of not notifying people about breakages = on > > systems that we don't have tinderboxen for, just to avoid filling up > > people's mailboxes. What do other people think? Am I making a mistake? > >=20 > > (Yes, in a perfect world we have tinderboxen for these ...) > >=20 >=20 > I think it's right thing to do for now. Most people don't have any resou= rces > to fix/test these, and it's not a tier1 platform, so I don't think it make > much sense to bother people with these failures. >=20 Also, it requires a lot of effort to keep track of these failures, which have had a message sent, how long ago, and if more than x days without reply or commit, mark it broken. Given those are Tier-2 platforms and the low frequency of errors, I would say that portmgr can use their time better on other matters. -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the future erwin@FreeBSD.org --dIV3CY5swYZsO92m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFLre5Gqy9aWxUlaZARAiygAJ92nAjKp2cfzbeq1lFhbKdREviy4QCgtdpN IYTC1MXlxIa3kPVUTR3phLk= =kt8l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dIV3CY5swYZsO92m--