From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 29 00:59:16 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 35CBE37B401; Thu, 29 May 2003 00:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (silver.he.iki.fi [193.64.42.241])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D309543FA3; Thu, 29 May 2003 00:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi)
Received: from PETEX31 (h81.vuokselantie10.fi [193.64.42.129])
	by silver.he.iki.fi (8.12.9/8.11.4) with SMTP id h4T7xCk8085354;
	Thu, 29 May 2003 10:59:12 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi)
Message-ID: <023f01c325b8$2cf96d60$812a40c1@PETEX31>
From: "Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi>
To: "Daniel Eischen" <eischen@pcnet.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10305282124570.11882-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:59:04 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: malloc(): error: recursive call
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 07:59:16 -0000

> 
> Note that if you are using my other spinlock patch
> (from http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/kse/spinlock.diffs),
> that also solves the problem but in a slightly different
> way.  That patch forces the library to reference the
> spinlock functions (the new spinlock implementation needs
> some initialization), so the table of references doesn't
> need to be changed (like the patch in the prior email does).
> 
Will either one of the patches make it to 5.1-RELEASE, please?

Pete