Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 12:39:24 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procfs problems in -current? Message-ID: <199508141039.MAA12063@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199508140640.QAA23880@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Aug 14, 95 04:40:40 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bruce Evans wrote: > > >Frames #11 and #12 both displayed bogusly as ``end ()'' in DDB. > > Unbogusly? Hmmmm... > >This should be the exact trap location. I think the ``end + ...'' > >means it has been executing code from the data/bss instead of the text > >segment. > > It probably means that lkm code from the heap was being executed. It's > hard to debug such code, so I never use lkms :-). Hmmm. Yup. Of course, lkms must be executed in the heap. Anyway, we used to have them, so they should work. And, there's still that suspicous looking argument mangling inside namei(). -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508141039.MAA12063>