Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:30:36 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: Big Makefile patch for WARNS settings Message-ID: <8663aksy43.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4AD2FD6E.8090208@FreeBSD.org> (Gabor Kovesdan's message of "Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:57:02 %2B0200") References: <20091011145021.GG36937@acme.spoerlein.net> <20091011170918.GU71731@hoeg.nl> <4AD2FD6E.8090208@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> writes: > What I noticed is that the patch sets WARNS?=0 for a lot of utilities, > which actually have higher WARNS-compliance. WARNS level 0 is the current default. All Ulrich's patch does is reverse the logic so that WARNS is 6 by default and anything that didn't already set WARNS explicitly sets it to 0, so the actual value of WARNS in each Makefile is the same as before. This is orthogonal to actually fixing whatever doesn't currently build at a higher WARNS level. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8663aksy43.fsf>