Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:11:20 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for thread testers Message-ID: <20030828001120.GI695@roark.gnf.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308272003290.9892-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20030827235853.GH695@roark.gnf.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308272003290.9892-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--16qp2B0xu0fRvRD7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:05:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Gordon Tetlow wrote: >=20 > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:05:28AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > >=20 > > > The questions that I would like to have answered are: > > >=20 > > > Does it take advantage of pthreads > > Yes. > > > Does it work with libkse and libthr > > Sort of. > > > Does it operate correctly > > libthr: tends to segfault (sig11). Occasional DNS resolution issues. > > libkse: tends to segfault (sig11), I've gotten my box to crash > > once too (BAD!). ^C still doesn't kill the process.=20 > > Occasional DNS resolution issues. Here's the output from the > > console: > >=20 > > Aug 27 10:22:41 Privoxy(134991872) Request: images.slashdot.org/greendo= t.gif > > Aug 27 10:22:41 Privoxy(134979584) Request: images.slashdot.org/pix.gif > > Aug 27 10:22:46 Privoxy(135041024) Error: could not resolve hostname im= ages.slashdot.org > > ^^^^--- This is bad, I have no problems resolving this normally. > > ^CAug 27 10:22:56 Privoxy(135163904) Info: exiting by signal 2 .. bye >=20 > How old is your kernel? SCHED_ULE or SCHED_4BSD? FreeBSD roark.gnf.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Aug 21 09:39:= 38 PDT 2003 gtetlow@roark.gnf.org:/local/usr.obj/local/usr.src/sys/ROAR= K i386 SCHED_4BSD > It could be that name resolution is giving it problems because > it's not thread-safe (in libc)... Probably, but it is still a problem that needs to be addressed. Is it possible to wrap the resolver in a umtx or some such other structure? -gordon --16qp2B0xu0fRvRD7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/TUioRu2t9DV9ZfsRAg0oAJ9aeldtNy+ItHPAR4xdkBywKJ6GNgCgpTXD aiJx60jVOJFeXENDAzdU5ME= =HtZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --16qp2B0xu0fRvRD7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030828001120.GI695>