From owner-freebsd-chat Sat May 10 05:24:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA03555 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 10 May 1997 05:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hda.hda.com (hda-bicnet.bicnet.net [207.198.1.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA03550 for ; Sat, 10 May 1997 05:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dufault@localhost) by hda.hda.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA26935; Sat, 10 May 1997 08:22:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199705101222.IAA26935@hda.hda.com> Subject: Re: Reply-to addresses In-Reply-To: <20151.863266590@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "May 10, 97 05:16:30 am" To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 08:22:52 -0400 (EDT) Cc: chat@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL25 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > The problem is deducing what people want. The eternally-growing > > "cc" list is a pain in the neck. But the individual in the reply-to > > address may appreciate the quick answer and not wait for the > > list delay. > > I think it's time to add automatic pruning. It's the only thing > which will work, and if you thought you really wanted two lists well, > our mailer software will simply say "no you didn't, trust me" and > I can honestly, totally, live with that restriction. :-) Yes, but you just did what Joerg complained about: cc'd me even though you know I'm on the list. Peter -- Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com) Realtime Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936